Bridging the technology gap

0%
Initializing systems
Code audit · architecture review · due diligence

Code audit and architecture review in India. Know what you have built.

We give you an independent, written review of your software: how it is built, where it is risky and slow, and what to fix first, useful before an investment, a purchase, a rewrite or a new team.

  • Plan and prioritiesA ranked list of what to fix first, with effort estimates
  • Security and dependenciesCommon weaknesses, vulnerable libraries and licence risks
  • Code and testsQuality, readability, test coverage and delivery practices
  • ArchitectureHow the system is structured, and whether it can grow

Plan and priorities. A ranked list of what to fix first, with effort estimates

430+Clients served
16+Countries
3 cloudsAWS, Azure, Google Cloud
CertifiedAWS, Azure, RHCSA, CEH
At a glance

MOUNTSMY provides code audits and software architecture reviews from Ahmedabad, India: reviewing structure and design, code quality, security against common weaknesses, performance and scalability, tests and delivery practices, dependencies and licences, with a written report of prioritised findings and a plan. It is useful for technical due diligence, taking over a codebase, or deciding between fixing and rewriting.

Covers
Design, code, security, performance, tests
Output
A written report with ranked findings
First step
A free scoping call
Access
Read-only
Before and after

From a black box to a clear picture

Many owners cannot tell whether their software is sound. A review replaces guesses with a written assessment.

Your path to a clear view

Example
Understanding
Nobody fully knows the systemKnowledge left with the last developer
A written pictureStructure, risks and strengths
Risk
Hidden problemsFound by customers or buyers
Findings ranked by impactKnow what matters first
Decision
Fix, rewrite or replace?A guess with a big bill
A reasoned recommendationWith effort and risk compared
  • Read-only access
  • A written, prioritised report
  • Honest about strengths too

An example path, drawn by us. Your review shows yours.

The reality

Six moments when an audit pays for itself

Each is a decision that is better made with facts.

01

An investor or buyer asks

They want to know the technology is sound.

What we doAn independent review gives a clear, written answer.
02

Inheriting a codebase

You have code and no map of it.

What we doA review documents the structure, risks and effort to maintain.
03

Slow, buggy releases

Every change breaks something else.

What we doFind the causes: design, tests or delivery practices.
04

Rewrite or fix?

A rewrite is costly and risky.

What we doCompare the real state of the code with the cost of change.
05

Security worries

You are unsure what weaknesses exist.

What we doReview for common weaknesses and risky dependencies.
06

Scaling troubles

The system struggles as usage grows.

What we doFind the bottlenecks and plan the changes.
A review, step by step

How we audit your software

We work read-only, and agree the focus first.

  1. ScopeGoals and areas to cover
  2. ReadCode, config, architecture
  3. TestTools and manual checks
  4. InterviewThe people who built it
  5. ReportFindings ranked by impact
  6. PlanWhat to do, in what order
What you gain

What an audit gives you

Clarity is the main deliverable.

A clear picture

How the system is built and where it is weak.

A ranked fix list

Impact and effort for each finding.

Security awareness

Common weaknesses and risky dependencies found.

Confidence for others

A written review for investors, buyers or customers.

A better decision

Fix, refactor or rewrite, with reasons.

A smoother handover

A new team can start from the report.

Terms explained

Code audit, architecture review and due diligence: what is the difference?

They overlap, and the focus differs.

TypeFocusOften requested by
Code auditCode quality, security and testsOwners who want to know what they have
Architecture reviewSystem design, scalability and structureTeams planning growth or a redesign
Technical due diligenceA balanced view of technology, team and risk for a dealInvestors and buyers
What we cover

Five areas of review

We agree the focus with you, and report honestly on strengths as well as risks.

Architecture and design

How the system is structured.

  • Components and how they connect
  • Data model and boundaries
  • Scalability limits
  • Single points of failure

Practice

DiagramsInterviewsLoad review

Output

Architecture summary
How we work

Five stages from scope to plan

We are independent, read-only and honest.

  1. 1

    Scope

    Agree the questions.

    What happens
    • Understand why you want the review
    • Agree areas and depth
    • Agree access and NDA
    You get
    • A scope note
    • A timeline
    • A fixed-scope quote
    Your part

    Tell us the decision this review supports.

    Safety net

    An NDA first if you need one.

  2. 2

    Access

    Get safe, read-only access.

    What happens
    • Read-only repository access
    • A walkthrough with the team
    • Collect documents
    You get
    • Access confirmed
    • A system overview
    • A list of questions
    Your part

    Provide read-only access and a walkthrough.

    Safety net

    We never change your code or systems.

  3. 3

    Review

    Examine the system.

    What happens
    • Read code and configuration
    • Run analysis tools
    • Check security and performance
    You get
    • Notes and evidence
    • Tool results
    • Questions for the team
    Your part

    Answer questions.

    Safety net

    Read-only throughout.

  4. 4

    Report

    Write it up clearly.

    What happens
    • Rank findings by impact
    • Note strengths
    • Estimate effort
    You get
    • A written report
    • A summary for non-technical readers
    • A ranked list
    Your part

    Review the draft and correct facts.

    Safety net

    Findings are checked with you before the final report.

  5. 5

    Plan

    Decide what to do.

    What happens
    • Discuss the findings
    • Recommend fix, refactor or rewrite
    • Plan the order of work
    You get
    • A walkthrough call
    • A phased plan
    • Optional help with the fixes
    Your part

    Choose the next steps.

    Safety net

    The report is yours, whoever does the work.

Why MOUNTSMY

A tool-only scan and MOUNTSMY

A scanner finds patterns. Engineers judge what matters.

A tool-only scanMOUNTSMY
MethodAn automated scanTools plus engineers reading the code
OutputThousands of alertsA ranked list of what matters
ContextNoneInterviews with the people who built it
BalanceOnly problemsStrengths noted as well
RecommendationA list of issuesA plan: fix, refactor or rewrite
IndependenceVendor-linkedHonest findings, even if it means no new work
What can go wrong

Six audit risks, and how we prevent them

A good review needs trust and clarity.

Your code is exposedRead-only access, an NDA and access removed when we finish.
A report nobody can act onFindings ranked by impact and effort, with a plan.
Unfair surprises for your teamFacts checked with the team before the final report.
False alarms from toolsEngineers review tool output before reporting.
Scope too wideAgree the focus up front, and extend only if useful.
A rushed conclusionCompare fix and rewrite on effort, risk and value.

Nothing in your systems is changed, and access is removed at the end.

Ways to work with us

Four ways to start

Most clients begin with a scoping call.

Code audit

A scoped, read-only review with a written report and a plan. Yours to keep.

Good for: A clear, independent view

Fixed-scope project

A clear scope, timeline and price for a defined piece of work.

Good for: A specific goal

Hourly

Fixes, audits and short tasks, billed by the hour.

Good for: Small or urgent jobs

Dedicated engineer or team

Part-time or full-time engineers working inside your tools, by the month.

Good for: Ongoing work and support
Where this fits

Code audit in the wider picture

It often comes before modernising, rebuilding or hiring.

FAQ

Code audit and architecture review: common questions

Something else on your mind? Ask us directly.

Ask a question
What is a code audit?

An independent review of your software's code, design, security, performance and tests, with a written report of findings ranked by impact.

Who needs a code audit?

Owners who inherited a codebase, startups before an investment, buyers doing due diligence, and teams deciding whether to fix or rewrite.

Do you need access to our repository?

Read-only access. We never change your code or systems, and we remove access when we finish.

Is my code kept confidential?

Yes. We sign an NDA before any detailed discussion if you need one.

What do we receive?

A written report with findings ranked by impact and effort, a plain-language summary and a plan, plus a walkthrough call.

Is it the same as VAPT?

No. VAPT tests a running system from outside for exploitable weaknesses. A code audit reads the code and design. They complement each other.

Can you review any language or framework?

We review JavaScript and TypeScript, Python, Java, PHP and .NET, among others, and tell you honestly if something is outside our depth.

How long does it take?

It depends on the size of the codebase and the depth. After scoping you get a timeline.

How much does it cost?

It depends on size and scope. After a free call you get a written plan and quote.

Can you fix the issues too?

Yes, if you want. The report is yours either way.

Related

Keep exploring.

More security & quality services

Ready for an honest look at your code?

Book a free 30-minute call with an engineer. We’ll send a written plan and quote after.